journalism in the US?

has anyone heard anyone in the media ask if the last stimulus worked?

this is the left

I found the base of the Democratic Party.

i tripped upong this delicious video. It's a meeting for the new "radical party" in NYC. middle aged babyboomer refugees of the green party in a room plotting "what must be done" to takeover the country. It's hilarious, especially the latinos at this meeting and what they say. By the way its run by hunter college professors who begin the session by reading out the party's new manifesto. By my count the ratio at this gathering was 84 percent jewish, 10 percent latino and 6 percent goyim. What a suprise.

I loved how upfront they all were about emphasizing this point: "we need to radicalize the blacks and latinos, we need more and more latinos in this country! dowtrodden, disadvantage, they're already communists probably and don't even knoww it, all we need to do is organize them and bring them to the polling booths, set up some free lunches, get this amnesty bill past, ok people! we need to go down into the ghettos and register these people, like acorn, perferably people who can't read, or who hate america, lets get the gangbangers active poltically, in the bottomline, this is the main way we can push socialism on america" Right they are.


http://fr.truveo.com/A-Radical-Party-Part-2-15-Street-Manifesto-Group/id/80661025

However amazingly, 44 minuetes into this video link, one of the marxists in the audience says something very true. He was talking about "regular" people and how americans (i.e. those regulars in the hinterlands) weren't smart enough to adopt communism.

He says "i went out and tried to be with these peoples! i sat in diners with these people..........and i don't know America anymore. i dont know this america. i and i think we don't even know america anymore"

how i wish someone had stood up at that moment and asked him to answer the question of why he no longer knew america. but then again leftists would never follow such a question to its unpolite conclusion.

my last status/open for answers

Daniel Schwartz Nations are built on loyalty of the heart. does anybody think that the hispanics rapidly becoming the main inhabitants of the southwest and our citys have any strong heartfelt affinity with the american people circa 1932 or 1789? or those who died in the civil war? our founders? our hereos? do they care more about cinco de mayo or the 4th of july?

Slogan or Reality? POltics or Country? Lies or Truth? Oh the questions the treasonous face from Kabul to the rio grande.

When Obama's sets a date for a big press conference inwhich he'll present his policy on a subject he and his team have been nworking on for months, don't except to be able to tell anybody what obama's policy on that subject is, the day after you've watched that press conference (and read that white house press realese). (And this is the very vagueness disguised as articulatness that makes so many peopl ga ga. Personally i prefer presidents with a lexicon they can fit into the back pocket of there levi's who give to you, straight and ungrammaticaly correct, but i guess alot of white liberals love watching black men talk properly and act presidential no matter how substanceless and gasy.)

That's why i'm not suprised -the day after obama "unvieled" his afgan policy- to find that this is the headline to Fred Kaplan's piece in slate today:

"Do You Understand Obama's Afghanistan Policy? Me Neither."

Well, he's sending more troops which is bad enough. lets hope he gives up on dmeocracy and signs some quite agreements with the taliban, god knows his/our media won't let americans know if he does.

Afganistan will show alot about dmeocrats and my theory about what treason bastards they are who put poltics befor ecountry evry time.

"lets go fight the good war! kill bin laden!" has been the best slogan for the democrats for the past 8 years, and i'm sure theyre notw illing to give it up even if they know that "the good war" is the unwinnable hopeless war that we must get out of fast and stop wasting so much needed money in every month.

why is it hopeless? well wait till tommrow ill tell you and the answer will be alot more substance than anything you've ever heard obama say.

Close your eyes, put your fingers in your ears and keep on shouting "He's so articulate! He's so articulate!" you don't want to know what cardcheck is

Liberals are in crisis, everyone i know no longer has there neat little talking point of the week. Why? Paul Krugman is critizing Obama. oh no! He even came on NPR to break the news. Krugman-who has always been a non partisan free thinking econmist who happens to be more to the left-said that obama had done 3 more idiotic and wasteful "paulson plans".

As i listened in t he car, i felt the sudden urge listening to krugmans common sence critqiue, to stand straight up threw the moonroof of the toyato and give Mr.Krugman a stand-O. And i felt the same way when david frum spoke the truth about Palin late last summer.

Whats the proper metaphor for this momentous occurence in liberaldome? caine and abel? yoko and the beatles? a smarter man could do the job.

A lot of democrats listening to krugman on npr must have been thinking "man, why ya' rain on the parade paul! if you don't have anything nice to say about barak then shut youor yapper! " and then the tears slowly slide down there checks.

Anyways, this krugman eruption has put liberals off gaurd. nothing to defend, nothing to attack (taking Rush out of context was so 3 weeks ago).

so what have they resorted to, "ya know, i watch obama's press conference and hes answering these questions and i think to myself 'god, bush couldnt even answer any of these', this guys just in another league." No matter if obama is boring, mendaious, deviously vague and evasive and supremely unitrested and uncapable of syaings omething you don't know or havent heard a thousand time sover, just think of your favriote BUshism and rejoice. And so no matter how badly obama does, or how obvious it is that he's wasting tons of money irresposncibilbly with a giant debt and lying about it everytime he goes on Tv to tell us he's not going to waste a damn and isnt going to use the crisis for unrelated projects, democrats can remain silent and happy, plugging there ears , closing there eyes, like children to drown out the news that obama's wrong and republicans right, shoutingover and over again "wow this guy's so much smarter than bush! wow this guys so much smarter than bush!".

They don't want to know what card check or the fairness doctrine is, when you tell them, they don't believe.

When you mention how much obama is increasing the debt and the billions he's spending on rebuilding palestine and tatto removal undre the guis eof stimulating the US econmy and not a dime on the shovel ready project of building a border fence-they just say "bush inherited a surplus and he put us in this huge dbet in the first place".


YOu tell dmeocrats about all the ridiclous things there party is doing and trying to do, what there making us pay for-illegals mortages-what they want to do-add 20 million illegals to the citizenry with the highest unem[lpyent rate in 20 years- or when you tell the that the last stimulus had no discernable impat on the econmy. They just say "well the republicans want to do nothing"

then you tell them infcat the republicans have madwe alternative proposals and they say "i havent seen that" and they dont wnat to see that like they dont wnat to and wont see what card check, or the fairness doctrine or amnesty is or would do or why the democrats want to pass them, cause then they would have to be outraged with the democrats and that simply isn't a option.

so liberals for the next 4 years will watch COUNTDOWN and Racehel maddow and re read their bushisms, and not read about that amnesty bill or what obama's doing to DC public schools or how absurdly he is wasting there money and how appalling the debt is, etc. and they get by just fine at there cock tail partys saying "my god, could you imagine if bush had tried to answer that question?"


and so now i know

What happened to the american people(1687-1968)?

Watching "Dr.Stranglove or how i learned to love the bomb" today something curious happened. I lay there-affectionatly positioned behind a beatiful female in my bed. The scene before us was one inwhich George C. SCott was speaking in "the war room" to the president about the nuclear situation over russia.

"Ya know these people we're really americans" i half whispered in my female companions ear.

"I think the 50's we're probably the really last decade of the americans"

"yeah, thats true" my female companion said, assuredly knowing what i meant.

ME: "we aren't americans, we're.. children of the world"

HER: yeah we are.

ME: i mean do you feel like a attachment to american history to the american people of the past, does our generation? our generation has the most trivial and nebulous national ideitity and only by default of being born here. And we certainly don't have any blood and soil pride about being american. do you know anyone who really has that? its like "i was born here" thats it. being american, to us, is a mere tecnocality by happenstance.

HER: its true.....


How did this happen, that the american people no longer exist?

well ofcourse, the usually suspects: the 60's, hippies, multicultrilism, hedonism, leftist professors, rock n' roll, cultural rot, etc. thats all true.

but another factor contributing to the loss of american idenity/pride/etc., is that 1. you can't love a nation you feel you don't know and 2. you can't love a nation that hates itself.

When i think of the chicago of my lifetime-one unrecognizable from my fathers chicago- i picture the most typical of chicago scene: A busy intersection, in my specfic case, i picture the bustop on the intersection of Western and Touhy Avenue. Gritty. Ugly. Heartless. Pollutted. Hungover. (Within view theres) One visible specmin of the old chicago a old /granite/ cornershop/apartment building that would have been have been generic when built but now stands out for its possesing actual arctecturial "charcter". The shop there is a old family owned lunch and breakfast restruant with boothes from the 70s thats going out of busines, and soon enough the propertier of the whole edfice will give way like all the others like him to devleopers. Next to it and everywhere else in the vincinty you can see what replaced other building like it. Another typical american landscape ravaged by modernist archeture and developers trying to make a quick buck. You have severely ugly modern condos with fake looking bricks built without any care or uniqiness intermixed with McDonalds and other such franchices. You got a ugly new Bank of America, ads covering in its tainted blackned windows of smiling people of different colors other than white, a striking contrast with the broken down, unfiendly/mean, thuggish, beleagured, bedraggled, blighted and smug faces down on the street. You got a traffic jam, smog, heat, conjustion, honking horns, spanish shouting, ringtones blaring, a public bus' pulling up on the corner letting out grey fumes from its exhaust pipe as it stops to pick up the representives of the new chicago: young black and latino hip hop kids who know or care about nothing and have no ideas and never read a book, who go to schools that are in fact absurdly overpriced day care centers to socialize, then you have poor decreipt white elderly persons with canes, a fragile frustrated looking hipsterish young professional without a mac book in his /walkingpouch/ and PC garbage in his head, a few crazy bedraggled homeless people hopped on crack, and then en mass you have the new primary inhabitants of chicago: hispanic migrants grouped together: short dark indigenous looking mexican men who work as dishwashers and metal collectorsa in baseball hats and dirty 2nd hand clothes, obese middle aged mexican women in big mickey mouse t-shirts and spandex capris, with worn disgruntled faces, with a flock of young kidss pread around her, after a day of cleaning houses, none speaking a drop of english.

There is something that effects you about seeing hispanics like these. They are like aliens or 2nd class citizens so alienated-by choice ofcourse-so alien-with no desire to be otherwise. It is as if you see eachother threw a plate glass partition. To an extent its this wya with black and latino youth today in the inner citys. These people came here to work thats it. not to assimilate in the true meaning of the word. They may adopt a fondness for our trash TV, but nothing else deeper than that.

So whats so depressing about the mexican migrants who care nothing for america and Mcdonalds and Banks of America that fill chicago? well they represent to one a country devoid of anything deeper than money and work and materialism, there is no heart, nothing to truelly identify with, nothing to do die for at all.

In america today, we are surrounded by people and things that care nothing for america, that we feel detached in everyway from, wheather it be the huge impersona; corporations who are now utterly devoid national loyalty that we come across in the form of the generic franchices they place in the monsterous shopping malls that have scourched so much of our earth, or the hispanics that now are the core of our major citys, their conclaves totally cut off from the america that they will soon inherit, they have no desire to assimiliate, they feel no affinity to the old america, to the amreica people circa 1920 or 1856 or those who perished in the civil war or our founders, or our heros:Polk, jefferson, adams.
It would be a lie though to say they had no feeling for america or its history, heros or its past, they most certainly do have feelings for those things. Those feeling being: resentment and hatred.


nevermind that hispanic immgrants are en masse joining and exspanding and seething and remaining threw the generations in americas underclass, what makes mass hispanic immgrantion (and perhaps all 3rd world or non european immgrantion) such a diaster and calamity-in my view- is a matter not of the pocketbook or a matter of statstics or a matter of genetics but a matter of the heart.


Nations are built on loyalty of the heart. The truth is that if you knew like i do that John Adams is in your lineage and if you know your scottish ancestors built this nation, love of nation is going to come naturally. It's that emotional, visceral blood-and-soil, "land of my fathers" attachment and pride that is the essential core of any nation and amreica is no excepation. Wheather for good or ill, race and history matter, people are tribal, people idenitify and group together with people who look like them, who share a history or a realigoun, etc and this is why every nation has a ethno cultural core and must have one. Once a nation loses a ethno cultural core-as happened in the Austro-Hungriaian empire and is happening today in France and the netherderlands-etnic strife occurs and nation breaks apart violently. Look threw history and you will find really no evidence to debase such a idea that just 50 years ago would have been undebatable(common sence). But look threw history for evidence that nations without ethno cultural cores fall apart or that (ethnic and religous) diversity leads to violence and strife, and you can hardly find a year that won't suffice to provide a example.

The responce is that we americans being so proggesive from our brutish ancestors have evolved-in our age of affluence- beyond all this unseemly, unprogressive things like enthno- cultural cores or enthic strife. And even if the white liberals who spout this drivel are really "post racial" in their own rights (which they surely aren't e.g. ask them to send there kid to a latino school), it is just them who matter in figuring out wheather enthic strife and tension and division and even violece could come to america. are the black and hispanic demographics projected by the ny times to bring in an end to the white european majority (in america) by 2050 as "post racial" ? The answer that we all know even without looking at the statstics that confirm are assumptions to that question is: Not at all. Race and enthno-centricity is supremly important to non whites.

Others respond by saying or atleast thinking, "genocide, racial, ethnic strife couldn't happen in 2009 or in the first world. thats all so african.".

So to those who think this business of enthnic strife and the importance of enthno cultural cores and diversity resulting in strife, is just a african or 3rd world thing and to those who think th ese things to be all so 19th century. i'll restrict myself (in finding examples to prove my point) to the developed world (aka europe and america) and to the last 10-15 years of history in such places, in .


"The way to prevent unrest, is to be very careful in who you let in"-Micheky Kaus

Why Republicans for Amnesty/Open Borders have no brians aka The Snake eating its own tail

In American Poltics it seems to be something like a rule that the most obvious exsplanations, answers and solutions (usually in regard to issues that make white people uneasy like race and immgration) cannot and will not be said or written in the mainstream media media.

Usually the reason why your barber Lou can so often give you a more common sence anyalsis than the entire media is mere fear and corruption. The denizens of DC-NYC poltical and social life who monopolize poltical anlaysis have dinner partys to worry about being invited to, valuable relationships (with poltical powerplayers) they don't want to needlessly squander (by unnescarily speaking truth) or else they live in constant fear of angrying the PC police on the right and left (who theyre friends are) and being marginalized in turn, relagated away from mainstream eminence to the great but obscure websites like Vdare.com (hence Steve Sailer).

But sometimes the reason the obvious is ignored is simply mysterious. For instance, why is it that no one recognizes the tragic stupidity of consertives for open borders or amnesty.

I recently watched a "principled" liberterian argue against a border fence and immgration laws all together, going so far to tell the crowrd before him that he felt the distinction between america and mexico should ideally be one as trivial as that between maryland and conticutt, basically a mere techinuilty.

Could this man not see why his "principled" ideas were- in this instance- self defeating. It would be hard to believe that such consvetives and republicans as George Will, John Mccain, George Bush, Lindsey Graham who support amnesty don't grasp the most basic effects the policy they advocate would have. Do they not know who they would be granted citzenship to in the millions? Do they not know what most 8th graders could figure in a few minuetes? that virtually making 20 million poor latinos citizens (overnight) equals something like the de facto importation of atleast about 16 million new democratic voters who will help bury conservtism.

Karl Rove who in a matter of a few years has gone from being known idoticlly as the great "evil genius" of american poltics to being a guy who is self evidently not very good at his job, would argue with the same myopic logic that made him assure us mccain would win in 2008, that latino immgrants are social consertive and thus are natural republicans. Rove's mind operates like a bad computer unable to do two things at one time. Thus Rove cannot grasp that while latinos may indeed be religous (atleast when they arrive) that they are also poor, and while they may be not amused by gay marriage, they are more willing to vote for free health care than too ban gay marriage and to cut theyre employers taxes.

The fact that anybody who professes to care about conservtism, free markets, limited goverment, indivual liberty can't see how those principles are imperiled by a open borders policy in regards to the southern border and/or the granting of amnesty for 20 million poor urban and uneducated latinos who are remaining poor urban and uneducated even after they become citizens is a bad idea, suggests strongly that said person is probably weak minded.

And i don't think poor urban and uneducated latinos gets across fully the type of people i'm talking about and just how destine they are to vote democrat from now until enternity.

These people will vote republican when either they win the lottery or the Republican party becomes the true party of Huckabee, social conservtive and progessive on demoestic policy. In other words they will vote republican only when the republican party dies and becomes simply Democrat Lite. You can forget all about those fine old liberterian conservtive principles, the term vouchers will become as archaic as the term viceroy, and the names of Hayek and Adam Smith, Rothbard and Mencken will be as foreign to the ear as Carletoon S. Coon. And if only the liberterian idiots and the compassionate conservtive blowhards like George Bush and his lame crew Micheal Gerson and William Kristol and John Mccain and Norman Podhoretz could see how there "hardcore liberterian principles" and their "compassionate conservtism", respectivly obliterated conservtism and libertianism and America itself. There faces would melt right off like the wird Nazi with the scar on his palm did at the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark.


THE TIME FOR HISPANIC IMMGRATION PANDERING ON THE RIGHT IS OVER. THE CONSERVTIVE MOVEMENT IS NEARING WHAT ALMOST CRETAINLY BE IT'S DEATH IF IMMGRATION IS NOT HALTED NOW OR IF THE DEMOCRATS APALLING AMNESTY BILL IS PASSED. ERECTING A BORDER FENCE, ABOLISHING THE 14th AMNEDMENT, ENDING CHAIN MIGRATION, CUTTING OFF ALL ENTITLMENTS TO ILLEGALS, VIGOROUSLY GOING AFTER SANCUTAURY CITYS, ILLEGAL HIDEOUTS AND BUSINESS' WHICH EMPLOY ILLEGALS AT THE STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS MUST BE RIGHT NOW THE NUMBER ONE Priority of all republicans and of all real american patriots or in the very least of anybody who even remotely gives a damn about the enviorment, national unity, national soveirgnity, patriotism, decreasing suburban sprawl, improving the schools, lowering the debt, better and cheaper health care, lower taxes, better neigborhoods, the black community, limited goverment, indivual liberty, school choice and a colorblind scociety with colorblind laws. For all of these causes the enviorment chiefly among them are imperiled by illegal immgration and in truth legal and illegal mass immgration in general paticularily from latin america and the 3rd world where 95 percent of those who have immgrated to america since 1965 have come from.

The fact that there are even republicans let alone democrats or any americans advocating granting 20 millions citzenship to illegals in addition now to the free health, public education and welfare we alreday provide illegals free of charge is a absolute disgrace. We in 2008 also give hispanics a republican candiate not to be forgotten.

HAVE NO DOUBT ABOUT IT. THE DAY THE TREASONOUS DEMOCRATS PASS THERE DISGUSTING AMNESTY BILL IS THE DAY WE SAY GOODBYE TO AMERICA ON IT'S LONG TRIP TO BECOMING A NIGHTMARE THAT OUR GRANDFATHERS WOULD NOT RECOGNIZE AND WOULD NOT WNAT TO EVER RECOGNIZE AS THAT GREAT COUNTRY THEY LIVED IN.


Heres a video that shows you quickly how appaling and treasnous that amnesty bill is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H01N7y8QO-c

John Derbyshire, telling it like it is

"Radio Derb with your host John Derbyshire" (a british Tory emigre turned average Joe/middle class hero) is one of those things that gives one hope and makes life signficantly more enjoyable. The commentary peppered with great brutal anglo humour is the most refreshing dose of common sence avialable to us.

heres this weeks RadioDerb, a dman good one i might add:

http://radio.nationalreview.com/radioderb/post/?q=NmM3ZmYxODdkNmI4YzI2Y2YyNjhmMzg0MzBhNTA5NjM=

Note: Derbyshire and Steve Sailer are kind of a great pair. Sailer also tells it how it is in very much the same way. BOth are a few of the rare conservtive who can speak truthfully on racial shake down artists, illegal immgration, and other similiar issues. Derbyshire writes a column for National Review and does his radio show and keeps a diary at NRO.com. He also writes for "the american conservtive" whose film critic is Steve Sailer who keeps a brillant blog Isteve.com and writes for the equally valuable Vdare.com which has a great blog aswell.