A NEW LOW: my first blog comment battle (though i do triumph)

The action went down like this at matt ygelisas' blog (http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/05/sonia-sotomayors-iq.php/comment-page-3#comment-1590319):

1. daniel schwartz Says:
   May 5th, 2009 at 12:52 pm

   can the people who support Sotomayor, please also say

   that they:

   1. support suing banks for not giving “enough” loans to minoritys and find such action constuitional.

   2. support throwing out the results of tests firefighters take because they don’t like the lack of passing minoritys scores and find such action constuitional.

   3. That they believe it’s unconstuitional for californians to vote to pass a proposition that would deny tax dollars to go to illegal imgrants.

   stand up tall and pride!

2. Barbar Says:
   May 5th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

   How do borderline illiterates wind up with opinions about who belongs on the Supreme Court?

3. SLC Says:
   May 5th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

   Re Daniel Schwarz

   Should one pay any attention to a fucking asshole like Mr. Schwarz who can’t even spell constitution? A visit to Mr. Schwarzs’ website (which I don’t recommend as it recalls visits to Don Blacks’ stormfront website) shows a bigoted shithead who hates Latinos.

4. daniel schwartz Says:
   May 5th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

   great arguments guys!

   you really made serious arguments, didn’t you?

   why don’t you address somethin besides my lack of spellchecking?

   how bout’ some actually arguments? how about you tell me how i’m wrong? tell me about why the mayor of new haven is right? etc.

5. joe s Says:
   May 5th, 2009 at 1:09 pm

   Would not a measure of her “brilliance” be the proportion of times her decisions are upheld or reversed at the next level compared to her peers(Sorry, I am not American and not sure if the next level is the USSC)

   Now that would seem to be a qualitative metric

6. SLC Says:
   May 5th, 2009 at 1:24 pm

   Re Daniel Schwarz

   How about Mr. Schwarz go fuck himself.

7. daniel schwartz Says:
   May 5th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

   you are so brillant SLC

   you really are such a great debater, so intellectual, not the slightest ad hominem out of you

   i guess your to embarssed to pubicly affirm your absurd racist views, your fervent support for racial quotas, suing banks for not giving enough loans to black people.

   but if you can’t defend yourself just call someone a racist, right?